Stop Guessing Your Freight Mix: The Cost-to-Serve Play That Saves Millions




There’s a quiet tax on most supply chains—and it isn’t fuel or surcharges. It’s guesswork. We inherit last year’s carrier allocations, trust a rate card that looked good in March, and then ride out a year where demand shifts, capacity tightens, and “cheap” lanes quietly become the most expensive part of the P&L.

The companies that break this pattern don’t chase the lowest sticker price. They change the question. Instead of “Who’s cheapest on Lane X?”, they ask: “What’s the true cost to keep our promise here—this week?” That mindset is cost-to-serve (CTS), and once you start looking at your network through it, the cracks in the old approach are hard to unsee.

Price vs. Promise

A lane that looks inexpensive on paper can be brutal in reality. A parcel provider that misses afternoon cut-offs in the Valley of Mexico by 30 minutes doesn’t just deliver late; it sets off a chain reaction—customer care time, reships, chargebacks, and extra days of safety stock to buffer the unpredictability. None of that lives on the rate card. It all lives in your margin.

CTS reframes the decision: What combo of mode and carrier actually lands on time, with the fewest touches and the least drama? Sometimes the answer is FTL to a pool point with tight appointments. Other times it’s LTL with a carrier that’s boringly reliable. For eCommerce, it might be a parcel mix that changes with December’s weekly rhythm. The point is not to wed yourself to a mode; it’s to marry your promise.

The Mexico Reality Check

In Mexico, the difference between a smart mix and a costly one is magnified. Nearshoring has pulled volume into Monterrey (fast to Texas), Guadalajara (balanced national reach), and Estado de México (last-mile density). Each node changes the math:

  • Monterrey (MTY): Favors cross-border speed and Tier-1 reliability. Dedicated Truck & Driver loops can be worth 10 press releases’ worth of “resilience.”

  • Guadalajara (GDL): Plays well with FTL/LTL blends and stable parcel cut-offs for national replenishment.

  • Estado de México (EdoMex): Rewards precision—cluster/zone picking and strict carrier deadlines beat any last-mile heroics.

When you watch CTS instead of rates, you start staging inventory where promises are easiest to keep, not where rent is cheapest. It’s amazing how many “expedites” evaporate when the node moves 300 kilometers.

The Hidden Costs You Can Actually Touch

CTS isn’t an abstract financial model; it shows up in very tangible places on the floor:

  • Touches you didn’t plan for. A DC rejection because a label’s off by a line doesn’t just sting—it doubles handling, adds dwell, and steals time from orders that could have shipped.

  • Cut-offs you don’t meet. When waves release by FIFO instead of carrier deadlines, the carrier mix will always look worse than it really is.

  • Returns that linger. If saleable units don’t make it back into inventory within 48 hours, January looks like a slow month when it’s actually a slow process.

None of these require a new ERP. They require discipline: barcode fidelity, photo-QA where it matters, and an ops rhythm that respects carrier clocks.

A Tale of Two Lanes

A brand shipping from GDL to CDMX runs everything parcel because the rate is attractive. On paper, it wins. In practice, three missed cut-offs per week push OTIF to 92%. Customer service gets busier, and “savings” vanish in reships, churn, and extra buffer stock.

They reroute half the volume to LTL pool distribution with daytime appointments. OTIF jumps to 97%, chargebacks fade, and—once the failure costs disappear—the true cost per delivery is 8% lower than parcel. No magic. No new software. Just a better answer to the right question.

Why the Best Networks Feel…Boring

High-performing networks don’t look flashy. They look predictable. Cut-offs are published and treated like SLAs. Waves release backward from those deadlines. Top SKUs sit within a short walk of pack stations. Exceptions move to a side lane instead of infecting the main path. Carriers are rebalanced weekly based on OTIF and cost per stop—not because marketing signed a Q4 promo, but because the numbers said so.

The result is almost anticlimactic: fewer expedites, fewer apologies, calmer mornings, better margins. You’ll miss the chaos for about a week.

What Changes First When You Embrace CTS

  • Conversations. Ops, finance, and sales stop debating anecdotes and look at the same dashboard: OTIF by lane/carrier, cost per stop, and where exceptions actually come from.

  • Node choices. Inventory migrates toward service, not square meters. MTY, GDL, and EdoMex become tools, not identities.

  • Carrier relationships. You still sign annual contracts, but weekly volume follows performance. Carriers improve—or capacity moves.

Not a Transformation—A Decision Habit

You don’t need a transformation program to stop guessing. You need a decision habit. Pick the lanes that matter, measure the things that matter, and let the allocation follow the truth instead of tradition. The savings are rarely loud, but they’re stubborn: steadier OTIF, fewer surprises, and margin that doesn’t melt in December.

If You’re Ready to See It

Or start where most breakthroughs start: ask, “Which lane is hurting us the most this week—and what does the true cost say we should do instead?”

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas populares